Life of the New Party

National Review Online | Published on

By Stanley Kurtz

Print Friendly


A variety of evidence now indicates, with a high degree of likelihood, that Barack Obama was a member of the far-left New Party, which also endorsed him in his first run for the Illinois state senate in 1996. Obama's New party ties graphically illustrate the connection between his troubling “associations” and the core economic issues of the presidential campaign. The New Party's agenda was radically redistributionist. More important, the New Party's specific strategy for achieving its economic goals precisely paralleled Obama's now infamous 2001 radio remarks on “major redistributive change.” So let's take a tour of New Party ideology, after which we can explore the ever-increasing evidence that Obama himself was in fact a New Party member.

Left of Liberal
Obama's New Party-endorsed first run for office began in late 1995. So it's of interest that New Party co-founder Joel Rogers published an essay describing the Left's need for the New Party in the March/April 1995 issue of The New Left Review. (The New Left Review, can fairly be described as a prestigious outlet for writing that is largely Marxist/Socialist in content.) Since the revelation of Obama's New Party ties, Rogers has striven to paint his outlook as mainstream and moderate. Yet this 1995 article, contemporaneous with Obama's run for office as a New Party-endorsed candidate, gives the lie to that claim.

It's notable that New Party supporter and left-extremist Noam Chomsky is one of the few readers thanked in Rogers's acknowledgments. From there, Rogers quickly links his political prescription to the claim that there are fundamental problems in the way American society is structured. Above all, Rogers expresses disdain for liberals, who characteristically refuse to take steps to gain “social control of the economy” or to put “serious constraints on capital.” Mere liberals (embodied for Rogers by Bill Clinton) are corrupt tools of “unconstrained capitalism.”

In Rogers's view, then, American capitalism needs to be tamed and transformed in fundamental, structural, ways, a task which mere liberals are unable and unwilling to undertake. Rogers does also slam America's use of force in pursuit of its foreign policy goals, and decry our legacy of “four hundred years' racism.” Yet his focus is clearly on the need to transform the very structure of the American economy.

This is why Rogers addresses himself, not to Clintonian liberals, but to “progressives.” For Rogers, the key difference between the two is that liberals are unwilling to generate a popular movement from below that would remove command of the economy from the hands of corporate capitalists. Liberals are content to manipulate the public from above, when what's actually needed, says Rogers, is “mobilizing outside the state.” Only such grassroots mobilizing can hope to challenge corporate power.

Incremental Socialism?
Does this make Rogers's a socialist? Arguably, yes. But the answer to that question is not a simple one. Rogers hopes to avoid the socialist label. Like many on the far left, he couches his ultimate goals in euphemism and convoluted language. So instead of calling for socialism, Rogers demands “economic democracy.” That sort of euphemism produces locutions that would strike most Americans as odd: “The biggest ‘rule' and barrier to democracy, of course, is capitalism–private ownership of the means of production…and what follows does not seek to change that rule directly.” In this passage, the word “democracy,” serves as a virtual synonym for socialism, to the point where capitalism itself is described as the greatest “barrier to democracy.” What Rogers seems to want to say here is that the entire capitalist system is blocking his ultimate socialist goal. But of course he can't afford to say that out loud. So instead he simply calls capitalism “undemocratic.” Yet in the same phrase, Rogers notes that his strategy for undermining capitalism is long-term and indirect (“what follows does not seek to change that rule [i.e. capitalism] directly”).

Rogers explains that his short-term goal is to create “new forms of domestic regulation more heavily reliant on citizen watchdogs.” This “democratization” of the economy would not only constrain capitalism, without quite replacing it, but would also build long-term momentum for deeper structural change: “The reforms proposed…would permit the qualification of capital's property rights and a demonstration — essential to mobilizing support for more stringent democratic efforts….” (Here, the word “democratic” again serves as a kind of euphemistic synonym for “socialist.) Or again, Rogers speaks of his proposed reforms as initial small steps toward major systemic change: “Also, the reforms facilitate greater popular control of capital itself, which would permit experimentation with different forms of ownership and production….”

What exactly does Rogers mean by “new forms of domestic regulation more heavily reliant on citizen watchdogs”? The obvious answer is ACORN. ACORN's founders were central to the creation of the New Party, and the strongest New Party chapters (very much including Chicago) were built around preexisting ACORN-dominated organizations. ACORN's systematic campaign against America's banks was a crusade to “constrain capitalism” through “citizen watchdogs.” Unfortunately, ACORN's “citizen watchdogs” forced the entire banking system to abandon traditional credit standards, thus paving the way for our current economic meltdown. (See “Planting the Seeds of Disaster.”)

Yet what Rogers and his ACORN allies obviously desire is to extend the model of ACORN as the “watchdog” of capitalism to our entire economic system. ACORN moved from local community organizing, to pressuring local banks, to gaining influence and even a semi-formal role within the federal government and the banking system itself. Rogers wants to spread that pattern through the whole economy.

Rhetorical Smokescreen
Rogers is fairly open about his strategy of rhetorical disguise. For example, he wants his economic reforms to be couched as a new “bill of rights.” What would these new economic “rights” entail? A de facto guaranteed minimum income, wage controls, and guaranteed full employment established by a mandated shortening of the work-week. Rogers calls this “employment redistribution.” Technically, Rogers wants to do all this within the existing capitalist framework. Yet skeptics could be forgiven for probing behind the euphemism and incrementalism for a long-term agenda that plausibly appears to have socialism as its end-point. More important than resolving this labeling dispute, however, is recognition that the New Party agenda is both radical and exceedingly redistributionist.

Perhaps understandably, the New Party was extremely reluctant to put forward a formal platform. In 1996, however, the same year Obama won his first office as a New Party-endorsed candidate, Harvard economist Juliet Schor authored a programmatic statement for the New Party entitled, “A Sustainable Economy for the 21st Century.” (This was later expanded and published by Schor as a book.) r />
The original pamphlet was reviewed by David Levy, a sympathetic scholar from the University of Massachusetts, Boston, in Dollars and Sense: The Magazine of Economic Justice. (You can find a slightly reworked copy of Levy's review here.) Some passages from Levy make it clear that if the New Party is not socialist, this may have more to do with calculated political presentation than with underlying ideology. In any case, socialist or not, the New Party's proposals are radical:

…Schor is careful not to sound too radical either–there is not talk of socialism or other language that might scare away a public suspicious of left-wing rhetoric. [New Party co-founder] Dan Cantor is emphatic in stating that “this is not a socialist party.” Cantor prefers the term “egalitarian democracy”…

Rather than specify a detailed blueprint of the “ideal” economy, the New Party's approach is to emphasize the process of transforming the one we have. Engaging in this process would, of course, entail a radical change in the economic system: it requires a shift in power away from owners of corporate capital toward workers, consumers, and other groups of disenfranchised by the current system…

While the pamphlet does not advocate nationalization of the means of production, or discuss forms of ‘market socialism”…many of the policies would indeed be considered radical in the context of contemporary American (and even European) politics.

Radio Barack
The New Party's approach to the problem of economic redistribution closely parallel's Barack Obama's 2001 radio remarks on economic redistribution. Obama may not have had any principled objection to bringing about economic redistribution via the courts. Yet he voiced a pragmatic preference for promoting redistributive change through “community organizing and activities on the ground.” Like Rogers, Obama implicitly distinguished between the contemporary “liberal” attempt to promote change (to the extent it was willing to do so at all) by direction from above (i.e. the courts), and the bolder “progressive” desire to build an organized base for “major redistributive change” from below.

Are Obama's radical plans all in the past? There is no reason to think so. Aside from the fact that 2001 is not very long ago, Obama shows every sign of hoping to build a base for long-term economic change from below. Obama's has promised a massive national service program closely allied with the nonprofit sector. In conjunction with this, Obama plans to remove “barriers for smaller nonprofits to participate in government programs.” In other words, Obama plans a massive effort to funnel America's youth into volunteer work alongside the likes of ACORN. Not only might Obama's favorite community organizers soon be training your child, the ultimate goal is arguably to bring to fruition Rogers's dream of “popular governance rooted in mass democratic organization.” Over time, that is, a substantial new public sector, composed of radical community organizers and politicized student “volunteers,” would form the nucleus of a newly “democratized” capitalism. Some might call this the New Party road to de facto socialism.

If these are Obama's goals, I doubt he wants to achieve them all at once, any more than Rogers himself wanted to do so. As I've argued elsewhere, Obama, like so many of his community organizer colleagues, practices an “incremental radicalism.” The point is not to push for the whole redistributionist agenda right away, but to gain a series small but cumulative victories, each of which contributes to the formation of a long-term coalition for more ambitious systemic change. Even as president, I think Obama would hew to this incremental strategy. But I do think we have reason to believe that Obama's long-term goals may be little different from Joel Rogers's.

New Party Ties
At any rate, there can be no doubt that in 1996, Obama made his first run for office as a New Party-endorsed candidate. And while Obama and Joel Rogers continue to deny it, a raft of accumulating evidence points to the fact that Obama was a New Party member. I presented some of the key evidence in “Something New Here,” where I also explained what the New Party was, and highlighted its close ties to ACORN. Thanks to the efforts of “New Zeal” blogger Trevor Loudon, we now have important documentary evidence from the spring 1996 issue of the New Party's key national organ, New Party News, that Obama was in fact a New Party member.

Additional evidence can be found in this New Party announcement from 1996. A publication called The Progressive Populist also identified Obama as a New Party member here. Perhaps more important, this “Chicago New Party Update” from the newsletter of the closely allied Chicago Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) suggests that, in Chicago, the distinction between an endorsed New Party candidate and a New Party member may have been non-existent. According to this report, “Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.” In effect, then, the contract signed as a condition of endorsement constituted a commitment to membership in the organization. And even in the highly unlikely event that the several contemporaneous reports of Obama's membership in the New Party were somehow mistaken, the fact that his endorsement required him to maintain a “visible and active relationship” with the party confirms the existence of close and supportive two-way ties. We already know that Obama was closely allied with key New Party figures, and remained so for many years. (See “Something New Here,” linked above, and “A Party Without Members?“) All of this means that we are perfectly entitled to treat Obama as a strong and close supporter of the New Party, and almost certainly as a member as well.

Denial
I've engaged in a spirited back and forth with the Politico's Ben Smith over the existence and significance of Obama's New Party ties. Smith relies uncritically on New Party co-founder Joel Rogers's characterization of his ideological agenda, and on Rogers's shifting and unsupported denials of Obama's New Party membership. Rogers
's manifestly absurd claim that the New Party didn't have members has already been retracted.

In fact, a large number of news stories, and the New Party's own literature, repeatedly note that the party does have members, without adding any of Rogers's tortured qualifications. In a Fall 1997 article in New Labor Forum, for example, New Party cofounder Daniel Cantor and ACORN's lead national organizer, Wade Rathke brag that the New Party has 10,000 members.

Such references could be multiplied, but why go on with this charade? The New Party had members, and Barack Obama was one of them. That is what contemporaneous documents tell us, and that is the reasonable inference to be made from the requirement that endorsed candidates sign a contract of party support. We know that Obama was a close ally, supporter, and even funder of key New Party figures. At a minimum, it is intriguing that one of the key lawyers who argued the New Party's famous “fusion” case was both a partner in Obama's law firm and the wife of Joel Rogers. And if, in the exceedingly unlikely event that, all evidence to the contrary, Obama was somehow not a New Party member, his ties to the party were in any event extraordinarily close and reciprocal.

What Obama Wants?
All of this matters, not because of some simplistic associational “gotcha,” but because Obama's still somewhat mysterious ideology, as revealed in that 2001 radio interview, is greatly illuminated by his New Party ties. The New Party advocated gradual, but radical economic change, arguably socialist, but in any case heavily redistributive, all swathed in the soothing vocabulary of traditional American democracy, and grounded in the hope that the reach of groups like ACORN could one day be multiplied many times over. This, I'd wager, is what Barack Obama believed when he was endorsed by the New Party in 1996, what he believed when he spoke of “major redistributive change” on the radio in 2001, and what he hopes to accomplish (over time) should he become president of the United States in 2009.

– Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Trackbacks

  1. testen says:

    … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More here: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  2. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  3. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More here: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  4. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More here: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  5. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More here: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  6. Healing’s Dragon…

    to discover difficulties to enhance my web page!I suppose its alright to produce usage of a couple of of your concepts!!…

  7. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Informations on that Topic: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  8. cow man90 says:

    The Absent Game…

    In between me and my husband we’ve owned far more MP3 gamers through the years than I can count, like Sansas, iRivers, iPods (basic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few a long time I’ve settled down to one line of gamers….

  9. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Informations on that Topic: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  10. Trackback says:

    Thank you…

    How can I get a support question to the blogger team?…

  11. Trackback says:

    Like it…

    I have a weird desire now to make a false blog. What is a good blog site to do this and let people know that its not really my thoughts but of my characters thoughts?….

  12. Trackback says:

    wow thats great…

    How much blog traffic will affect to my blog if I convert my blog name with different domain name?…

  13. Trackback says:

    wow thats great…

    are blog posts reason enough for a company to sue an individual according to the Indian law?…

  14. Trackback says:

    I like your blog…

    I want to start a blog to write about everything that happens at school and with friends… anonymously… any sugestions?….

  15. add web link says:

    best free web directory…

    I think there might be a several duplicates, but an exceedingly useful record! I’ve tweeted this. Several thanks for sharing!…

  16. hotel krakow says:

    Rolland Regan…

    Simply nvosdss desire to say your article is as amazing. The clearness in your post is just cool and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks …

  17. free web hosting reviews…

    Trying to get forward to finding out extra from you afterward!……

  18. Maryjane Wigdor…

    I discovered hgpaaxx your blog site on google and test a number of of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the superb operate. I simply additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Seeking ahead to reading extra from you in a while!……

  19. pakiet alive says:

    Shane Schuur…

    Thanks for your article vncossd. It’s very unfortunate that over the last decade, the travel industry has already been able to to fight terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, bird flu virus, swine flu, plus the first ever real global tough economy. Through it the…

  20. Trackback says:

    Great…

    I want to start an online business where I can earn money. I am planning an online parent coaching business where I can help parents through email and telephone conversations. I’ve never started a website and would like it to be fairly easy (if possib…

  21. ppc…

    So sorry you may pass up the workshop!…

  22. Orlando Pucket…

    As I web-site jegowef possessor I believe the content material here is rattling magnificent , appreciate it for your efforts. You should keep it up forever! Best of luck….

  23. Check this out…

    [...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

  24. Links…

    [...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……

  25. Awesome website…

    [...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……

  26. Websites you should visit…

    [...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

  27. check your pagerank…

    Superb data could be discovered on this net weblog….

  28. DealerSocket says:

    Hello!…

    An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him… lol. So let me reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spend…

  29. look here says:

    You should check this out…

    [...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……

  30. Shona Crespin…

    Can I just say oasjdasd what a aid to seek out somebody who actually is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know the best way to deliver an issue to gentle and make it important. Extra folks need to read this and understa…

  31. Sharleen Romanson…

    I loved as much as dirotd you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably c…

  32. … [Trackback]…

    [...] Read More: eppc.org/publications/life-of-the-new-party/ [...]…

  33. best buy laptop…

    I believe there may perhaps be a couple of duplicates, but an exceedingly handy checklist! I’ve tweeted this. Many thanks for sharing!…

  34. marina residences palm jumeirah dubai…

    Involving me and my husband we have owned a lot more MP3 gamers over time than I can count, which includes Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few ages I’ve settled down to one line of players….

  35. affiliate program directory…

    to locate concerns to enhance my web-site!I suppose its okay to create utilization of a couple of of the principles!!…

  36. sklepy says:

    Lynsey Fabus…

    Would you be dirotd serious about exchanging hyperlinks?…

  37. cheap seo services uk…

    Great Morning, I just stopped in to go to your site and believed I’d say I appreciated myself….

  38. Awesome website…

    [...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……

  39. reference says:

    Recent Blogroll Additions……

    [...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……

  40. Demetrius Gesell…

    I think this is among the dirotd most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers…

  41. Danny Bellingtier…

    Thanks for the post djdioxs. My spouse and i have generally noticed that the majority of people are desperate to lose weight simply because wish to show up slim and attractive. Nevertheless, they do not usually realize that there are more benefits for …

  42. Lloyd Wiedenheft…

    Pretty djdioxs component to content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact loved account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your feeds or even I success you access consistently quickly….

  43. remodeling contractors…

    [...]although sites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we really feel they are really worth a go via, so possess a look[...]…

  44. marina putra north one residences penang…

    This could in all probability be really handy for many of your positions I want to will not only with my website but…

  45. Demetrius Gesell…

    Hello my djdioxs loved one! I wish to say that this post is amazing, great written and come with approximately all important infos. I’d like to see more posts like this ….

  46. Wilmer Uram says:

    Lloyd Wiedenheft…

    I’ve learn djdioxs a few just right stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you put to create one of these great informative website….

  47. Youlanda Goranson…

    hey there and thank you djdioxs for your info – I’ve certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this site, as I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to I could get it to …

  48. Awesome website…

    [...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……

  49. Larraine Hubertz…

    Throughout the djdioxs great design of things you’ll receive a B- for effort. Where you actually misplaced me personally ended up being in your facts. As they say, the devil is in the details… And that could not be much more accurate here. Having sa…

  50. Irvin Heroth says:

    Orlando Pucket…

    I’ve read djdioxs several excellent stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you put to create this kind of wonderful informative web site….

  51. Etsuko Laglie…

    There are djdioxs actually a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That may be a great point to bring up. I provide the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where a very powerful…

  52. Silberuhren says:

    Silberuhren…

    [...]that could be the finish of this post. Here you will discover some websites that we assume you will value, just click the hyperlinks over[...]…

  53. Etsuko Laglie…

    There is djdioxs noticeably a bundle to learn about this. I assume you made certain good factors in options also….

  54. Elton Rodarmel…

    I was suggested djdioxs this blog by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my trouble. You are incredible! Thanks!…

  55. website says:

    Thorn of Girl…

    Very good facts might be found on this web blogging site….

  56. Lloyd Wiedenheft…

    I have odiassd observed that costs for internet degree professionals tend to be a great value. For instance a full Bachelors Degree in Communication with the University of Phoenix Online consists of Sixty credits with $515/credit or $30,900. Also Ameri…

  57. The Ships’s Voyages…

    I feel technologies just can make it worse. Now there is a channel to in no way treatment, now there will not likely be a prospect for them to find….

  58. Websites worth visiting…

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……

  59. Cool sites…

    [...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……

  60. jabong Discount…

    [...]usually posts some very exciting stuff like this. If you?re new to this site[...]…

  61. important says:

    The Ships’s Voyages…

    I believe know-how just causes it to be even worse. Now there’s a channel to never care, now there won’t become a probability for them to find….

  62. my site says:

    Healing’s Dragon…

    to find matters to improve my internet site!I suppose its okay to help make usage of a couple of of one’s principles!!…

  63. HopHoang says:

    Websites you should visit…

    [...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

  64. Recommeneded websites…

    [...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……

  65. Superb website…

    [...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……

  66. site says:

    Third Flower…

    My wife and that i are now delighted that Albert could perform his scientific tests due to the ideas he had via your web page. It’s every so often perplexing to simply constantly be giving away actions which some individuals might have been offering. …

  67. iUnlox – Official iPhone IMEI Factory Unlocking Service…

    Are you searching for a way to unlock your iPhone 5s officially with a permanent IMEI unlock? Unlock any iPhone with any release of firmware. IMEI iPhone unlocks are permanent, processed by Apple, completed in iTunes and will not ruin your warranty….

  68. website says:

    The Silent Shard…

    This may probably be fairly handy for a few of your jobs I plan to don’t only with my web site but…

  69. ways to make money online…

    [...]we like to honor lots of other net web pages around the net, even if they aren?t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages really worth checking out[...]…

  70. website says:

    Thorn of Girl…

    Very good info can be discovered on this internet weblog….