Ethics and Public Policy Center
About EPPC Contact EPPC Support EPPC My EPPC
  Find:    
Home News & Updates Conferences & Events Programs Publications Fellows & Scholars

Home  >  Programs  > 
Evangelicals in Civic Life
Home
About
News & Updates
Conferences
Publications
Books
Center Conversations
Event Transcripts
Browse by:
- Author
- Title
- Type
- Date
Biographies
Links
Home  >  Publications  > 
Anti-Americanism and the BBC
Posted: Friday, May 18, 2007


ARTICLE
BritainandAmerica.com  
Publication Date: May 16, 2007

Restrained praise is in order for the BBC's Radio 4 series on anti-Americanism called "Death to America." The brainchild of senior Washington correspondent Justin Webb, the three-part program examined the hatreds toward America that are bubbling over in France, Venezuela, Egypt and beyond. "A pattern was emerging and has never seriously been altered," Webb said of his experience of anti-Americanism in Europe. "A pattern of willingness to condemn America for the tiniest indiscretion -- or to magnify those indiscretions -- while leaving the murderers, dictators, and thieves who run other nations oddly untouched."

It was this realization, he said, that launched him into the series, which aired three consecutive weeks last month. Any regular consumer of the BBC, if he's honest, must admit that Webb's simple insight is rarely if ever heard across the BBC's media colossus. It took guts for Webb to approach his superiors about the program concept, and a refreshing measure of fairness for the BBC's top brass to sign off on it.

The program is not without its flaws. Its promotional plug, for example, promises to question "the common perception" of the United States as "an international bully" and a "modern day imperial power." It's still debatable how common that perception is outside of the elite dining halls of London, Paris, Geneva and Brussels. (The election of Nicolas Sarkozy as French President  --  unashamedly pro-American  --  contributes to that debate.)

Take the Venezuela segment. America's foreign policy record in Latin America is problematic, to be sure. But one also wonders about the wisdom of offering Venezuela -- under the corrupt and demagogic rule of Hugo Chavez -- as representative of attitudes in the region. In the segment on Egypt, we're reminded of a rather startling statement from Condoleezza Rice in 2005: "For 60 years my country, the United States, pursued stability at the expense of democracy in this region, here in the Middle East, and we achieved neither," she said. "Now we are taking a different course. We are supporting the democratic aspirations of all."

After playing the clip for a leader of Egypt's opposition party, Webb delivered this question: "Do you believe the promise of America will come good, or do you feel they've betrayed you?" The question itself invites scrutiny: Do America's critics expect the United States to topple the government in Egypt? In the two short years since Rice made her confession about the failure of U.S. foreign policy, does it amount to a "betrayal" that Jeffersonian democracy has not yet arrived in Cairo?

Nevertheless, the BBC offered some unedited footage rarely seen on its network. Hallah Mustafa, member of Egypt's ruling party -- and an outspoken maverick and reformer -- made it clear that many Arab leaders use anti-Americanism to beat off challenges to their regimes. They deliberately and routinely misrepresent the United States on theirs state-run media. "I think America is a force for good," she said, "for freedom, for liberty, for human rights principles." Does anyone ever remember hearing that viewpoint from an Arab leader expressed so clearly on the BBC -- or on any other Western media outlet?

None of this is to suggest that anti-Americanism, fanned into flames by the Iraq war, isn't a serious problem in many parts of the world. Tod Lindberg of the Hoover Institution co-chaired a 2005 Working Group on Anti-Americanism which found declining European support for U.S. efforts to fight terrorism. A poll of the European Union (the entity named by presidential candidate Barak Obama as one of America's most important allies) found that 53 percent view the United States as a threat to world peace -- the same percentage that regard North Korea and Iran as a threat.

It's worth noting that, in Western countries, unfavorable views of America are concentrated among younger people. About 62 percent of Spaniards under the age of 30, for example, hold a negative view of the United States, compared to 39 percent of their elders. That may suggest that an older generation, with memories of America's role in defeating fascism and communism, is resisting the propaganda campaigns of the political left. Yet the failure of political leaders in America and Great Britain to effectively counter the disinformation that pours out daily -- especially in the Arab media -- must rank as one of the greatest public diplomacy debacles of a generation.

Nevertheless, there is a basic decency to the American creed -- that all men and women are endowed by their Creator with equal rights -- which remains deeply appealing. Justin Webb, to his credit, articulated that essential decency. He openly referred to America's democratic tradition, the idea of equality under the law, the commitment to free speech and freedom of religion. Webb's concluding remarks, anathema to terrorists and their liberal sympathizers, ought to be instinctive to most Europeans and enlightened Muslims in the Arab world: "To hate the essence of America is to be anti-human."

--Joseph Loconte is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a commentator on religion for National Public Radio.

The Quotable Cromartie
Recent clippings of VP and Senior Fellow. Michael Cromartie

On the new generation of evangelicals: "This new generation has the same convictions but without the edge. They may believe all the same things, but ... they've learned how to present themselves." (Washington Post, 3/6/04)

On politics and religion: Michael Cromartie, vice president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, said that "too often, at least in religiously conservative communities ... there seems to be a concern that we must first of all get the whole culture converted to our theology before you can work for public good." Such a conversion is "not going to happen," he said, so that the question becomes: "How do you find a public grammar, a public language in order to work with people who actually agree with you on the policy but don't agree with you on the theology?" (Washington Post, 2/20/05)

On J. I. Packer's book Knowing God: "Conservative Methodists and Presbyterians and Baptists could all look at it and say, 'This sums it all up for us.'" (Time, 2/7/05)

Michael Cromartie: "The large evangelical populace in this country will cut President Bush a lot of slack. It's the self-appointed leaders in the evangelical movement who won't. I think most evangelicals are more tolerant, and understand political reality more, than the heads of organizations who try to speak for these groups." (The Bakersfield Californian, 11/12/2004)

On politics and religion: "Sure, you have a lot of progressive religious people and, politically, they are going to vote for Kerry. Your problem is that you have a small but significant cohort in the Democratic Party that is really anti-religious and doesn't want to bring religious values and norms into the public arena. That makes it difficult for people from a more moderate to conservative bent religiously to be around the party. They feel excluded and unwanted." (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 10/10/04)

On politics and religion: "Michael Cromartie, director of the evangelical studies project of the Washington-based Ethics and Public Policy Center, said the religious left is preaching to the liberal choir, not religious swing voters. 'They already have this [liberal] vote,' he said. 'This National Council of Churches crowd is not about to vote for Bush, anyway." (Washington Post, 9/4/04, p. B9)

On natural law:  "Michael Cromartie, who directs projects involving evangelicals at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, invoked thinkers like John Calvin and concepts like 'common grace,' all with impeccable REformation credentials. 'A proper appropriation of the natural law tradition,' Mr. Cromartie wrote, 'can provide a public grammar for making appeals in the public arena to people who hold diverse philosophical worldviews and presuppositions." (New York Times, 8/21/04, p. A15)

Michael Cromartie: "The debate evangelicals are having among themselves today is not whether Christians should be concerned for justice, which we should, but what role and how large a role government should have in creating that justice. ... The debate we now need to have is whether certain policies have created more justice for the marginalized, or have they made matters worse? Many eminent social sicentists think the latter." (World, July 3/10, 2004)

Michael Cromartie: "People don't want a President to think that every important decision has a stamp of God's approval and that God is always on his side. ... [Americans] want their Presidents to be pious but not self-righteously so. So there's a paradox, isn't there? A President has to seem to be relying on God's wisdom but not acting like all his decisions are God's decisions." (Time, 6/21/04


Mark Noll
What is an "Evangelical"?
A thoughtful look at a complicated notion

Mark Noll, professor at Wheaton College, delivered a lecture on "Understanding American Evangelicals" at EPPC's 2003 conference in Key West, Florida. He provides the history of evangelical movements, discusses the number of American evangelicals, and takes the measure of evangelical hymns. An elegant and eloquent presentation for those curious about what it means to be an evangelical. 


 The views expressed by EPPC scholars in their work are their individual views only and are not to be imputed to EPPC as an institution.     
© 1974 - 2008 Ethics and Public Policy Center
      Comments on the website or technical problems? E-mail webmaster@eppc.org